Scripture Reading: II Peter 1:2-11
This book we call the Bible begins with Genesis, but it does not end with the book of Genocide. What does genocide mean? What does being White mean? What does the combination of these two words 'White Genocide' mean? Race and racism is the most important thing in the Bible. Every Law of God, biblical principle, contractual covenant and promise is predicated on the premise that God discriminates. All of the lofty and noble doctrines of Scripture cannot be understood without the element of racial interpretation. The removal of race from the Word of God began centuries ago in earnest. Color blindness, a euphemism for racial equality, is still being blind and “If the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into a ditch” Mt. 15:14. It's just like voting for the lesser of two evils, it is still evil. Knowing your identity is knowing your God. Knowing people of color is knowing the strange gods of racial aliens. Having a knowledge of racial differences is having a racial consciousness and puts the White man on the side of God. Having an ignorance of racial differences is having a color consciousness and actually foments the mentality of mongrelization and puts the White man on the side of false gods. The term 'White Genocide' as we shall see, does not help White people understand the meaning of life. Quite the contrary, the expression can inculcate the ultimate curse.
The word genocide was coined by the jew Raphael Lemkin in 1944, combining the Greek word genos, meaning race or people with the Latin word cīdere "to kill." The word genocide would take on a life of its own with the intent to foster a jewish agenda, as if jews were the only people in the world that could claim such a thing. Lemkin would initiate a pedestrian definition, which would be followed by defining it legally to accommodate international law. Lemkin spinned it thusly: “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.” That sounds very much like what they've done to White Christian America and the principles it was founded on in 1776. For at least two centuries, American racial policies reflected a consensus on race that was the opposite of what prevails today, because in more Christian -friendly times our people kept the Law of God. But who cares about that anymore? It wasn't until after the prosecution and torture of German officials, some of whom confessed under duress/torture about the so called Holocaust at the Nuremberg kangaroo trials, that the jewish United Nations defined the crime of genocide at the Genocide Convention in 1948; which also established the International Criminal Court that sits in the Hague, in the Netherlands today.
From Article II of this international treaty, the wording starts to sound like overkill: “In the present convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group as such: Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.” Article III describes what kind of acts shall be punishable: “genocide; complicity to commit genocide; direct and public incitement to commit genocide; attempt to commit genocide; complicity in genocide.” Article IV says it doesn't matter if the perpetrators of genocide are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals. Are you inclined to think that over the past several decades, the enforcement of the Genocide Treaty has been selective? Things that fall into this description have been totally ignored.