sábado, 28 de mayo de 2016

BNP London Leader, Steve Squire, says People Prescribing to Alien Sharia Should be Offered Repatriation


Interview Excerpt - "There are people prescribing to an alien culture (ie Sharia law) that are literally financially trapped in this country. Many don't even want to be here. I’d personally recommend helping them start their lives over in their homelands with the money we would save by repatriating them....They'd be free to do as they please there, abide by their strict religious rules, engage in barbaric practices like female genital mutilation and the sorts of things they believe in. This would free up council homes, school places and ease the strain on our public services. It would also then make room for more culturally compatible people (South Africans and Australians looking to join their families), who would be grateful, unlike the people here currently, who aren’t.
It is a win win situation for everyone." Steve Squire, London BNP Organiser
Jack's words are emboldened and are typically in the form of a question. Steve's response is in standard text.
Can you tell us a little bit about the work you do on the ground in London?
We run flash demos which we call with little or no notice. We literally just show up on the street and engage people.
We have outreach stalls where we hit the high street and speak to people in need, hand out literature, and tell people what we are all about.
We do community work – things like setting up food banks, handing out and collecting food, as well as aiding elderly people who feel threatened in their own homes. Sometimes this threat comes from anti-social elements in the community, other times from immigrant newcomers trying to drive people from the homes they’ve lived in for decades so they can bring their family members in from another area, even country.

BNP London Leader, Steve Squire, says People Prescribing to Alien Sharia Should be Offered Repatriation – Interview part 2
Prepared for battle
I take a lot of phone calls from elderly people that live on their own especially. Some have been preyed upon by Somalis trying to force them out of their homes. Immigrants seem to make a habit of trying to force old white English ladies out of their housing.
We also make sure that the newcomers know we're about. We endeavour to make our presence known in London.
We sometimes install secret cameras the police can use as evidence of racial intimidation. We make short videos we post on the BNPTV channel. We are engaged in the community.
Also, I'd like to be clear, it's not just the indigenous population that contacts us.
We get people from all walks of life looking for our help. We even have Caribbean people ringing us now. We had one instance we gave to Carlos (former BNP London Mayoral candidate) where a black single mother was being abused by a local school authority.
The Labour Party didn’t want to know about her as they’ve lost interest in the black community so she rang us. The Left have sucked the life out of the Caribbean vote. They're now onto the new immigrants now.
Basically we engage the community like no other party is willing to.
Your party fared better in the 2010 election than UKIP. Can you explain what changed since then?
In my opinion the 2010 election was an electoral trap. We (the BNP) did well to get elected in the European elections, but our success meant we were going to be susceptible to UKIP’s advance. The establishment was never going to allow an actual Nationalist party to keep their seats, and UKIP seized the opportunity to hijack our votes.
UKIP quickly recognised that with the assistance of the mainstream media they could capitalise on our success, and nick our seats.
I’d been following the ascent of UKIP since 1999 and noted that they’d not once ever addressed the issue of mass immigration into Britain-the main issue the BNP had run on at the European elections.
They were still the one issue party (getting Britain a referendum on EU membership) until right up to the Feltham and Heston parliamentary by-election in 2012, where David Cameron and the Tories shot their fox by offering a referendum on the EU, so UKIP had to jump on the BNP’s issue (immigration) for their very survival.
That, coupled by the fact that the BNP was in financial turmoil, didn’t help. We were a runaway locomotive with all of our carriages on fire through the mid 2010’s. We have been uncoupling them ever since.
Some people point to the infamous BBC Question Time event where Nick Griffin was ambushed as the turning point, others talk about our well-publicised infighting. In my estimation it was a combination of all of these factors.
Do you agree that UKIP is in fact controlled opposition? That one issue groups like the English Defence League (EDL) and Britain First are fixated on Islam as they are being funded by Zionist groups based in the United States?
Paul Golding, the founder of Britain First used to be active in the BNP. I don’t know about his organisation’s funding, however I find it hard to believe he’d take any money from Zionists. Paul comes from a good family of Nationalists-his granddad stayed behind in Dunkirk and was a WW2 hero. I doubt he'd let Zionists infiltrate his organisation, as much as I doubt he'd let anyone with a bushy beard get to him from the other side.
One thing I do know for sure though is that the EDL was founded and funded by a group of Zionists working with Frank Gaffney’s Center for Policy Studies, with a view to radicalising young white lads to go on the street and be the racist scapegoats for Zionist politicians like Pamela Geller. People like Gaffney and Pam Geller in particular were responsible for inciting Anders Breivik to violence in Norway.
Like Breivik, our lads would come out looking like racists and violent white thugs, we’d have an ethnic war on our hands with the Muslims and the BNP weren’t going to allow them to get away with that.
Are you aware of how deeply embedded Zionist infiltrators and banksters are in UKIP? Can you give some examples? (Please be sure to show Steve your support by clicking like on their Facebook pageor by contacting them on london@bnp.org.uk :)
It’s become increasingly more obvious of late that UKIP has been infiltrated. This is evidenced by UKIP’s strengthening media profile and weakening policies. By that I mean, although they are becoming a party of less and less substance, they're getting more coverage.
That’s not to mention the Kosher financial support they receive from well-known media moguls like Richard Desmond (Jewish Daily Express boss), who previously funded the Labour Party and their extremist immigration and left wing policies. One cannot be pro-immigration one moment only to switch to a party that’s supposedly anti-immigration the next.
We all know that Desmond didn’t change his opinion on immigration.  Once a pro-immigration extremist, always a pro-immigration extremist.
For people who might want to believe Desmond changed his stance. Ask yourself why a media mogul worth billions change his tune for UKIP? He's the one giving them the bloody money! It's UKIP that at some point changed their tune to suit his agenda-assuming they were ever even critical of mass immigration.
I say that as one need only look at UKIP’s immigration policy to see it’s wishy-washy at best. Steve Woolfe and co speak about a points based system but have yet to tell the public how the whole thing's going to work. There are no specifics. It's all about getting votes and looking good on the TV. When Woolfe had the chance to push for an immigration quota, he didn’t.

They’re populists and people supporting them, dupes.
Farage is also quite cosy with Neocon warmonger Rupert Murdoch, was at one point a City hedge fund manager and is now linked to Neocon news publication Breitbart, Schneur Odze and a variety of other Zionist suspects. 

Bottom line: UKIP, like the big businesses controlling them, can't be trusted. One minute they're for fracking, next they're against it.
They were at one point for the HS2 (costly high speed train), then against it, and now apparently in favour of it again.
We (the BNP) have always known UKIP were more Tory than the Tories. They're just proving it for all to see now.
Just look at their stance on maternity leave for heaven’s sake. There's nothing socially responsible about any of UKIP’s policies regardless of who they employ to push them. They are pro big business profiteering animals and again, more Tory than the Tories.
Have any of these infiltrators attempted to hijack your party?
I had heard that some shady people had made overtures towards BNP leadership in the mid 2000’s but nothing ever came of it. I can't see any relationship developing between us and Zionists due to our enormous ideological differences. There will always be a conflict of interest.
The BNP believe in the nation state and will ALWAYS put Britain first.  We also haven’t forgotten about the King David hotel bombings and Orange Grove murders, the former just having their 70th anniversary on the 22nd of July.
One of the filthy terrorists in fact, one Mirriam Issacaroff, is alive and well, living in Finchley (London suburb) on a British pension no doubt.
I'm doubtful anyone has gotten a penny in compensation from the cowardly King David Hotel perpetrators, which included Israel's first Prime Minister Menachem Begin.
The fact that a 94 year old bean counter (Germany charges 94-year-old former Nazi SS officer over 3,681 murders at Auschwitz) languishes behind bars for the Holocaust while Zionist Labour Lord and Paedophile Greville Janner and terrorist Mirriam Issacaroff, still roam the streets of Britain freely, indicates just how much power the Zionists have over our government, all European governments.
The only party in Britain that they have no hold over whatsoever is the British National Party. We are made by Brits, for Brits and it will remain that way on my watch. We are free wheelers so to speak and that's why the media continually marginalises us.
There are more than half a million people living in Britain with a connection to South Africa. What can the BNP offer them that’s different from the other parties? 
People with South African connections only need to know that we exist, and they will vote for us. Only a South African that supports the ANC and the current anti-white mess over there would not.
South Africans know what it's like living in a country run by Nationalists.
What in your opinion does a nation run by nationalists look like?
Imagine a country where you don’t have to worry about children walking home from school. Or where your elderly parents don’t have to decide between eating or turning their heating on in the winter. Where criminals are punished and immigrants only make it into their land when they have something to contribute.
Although it might be hard for a lot of British to envisage, South Africans know what it's like living in a country run by Nationalists.
We’d also recognise the importance of only ever allowing culturally and ethnically compatible people into the country. We’d send people unhappy being here back from whence they came, freeing up space in the process.
Is that how a BNP government would facilitate the entry of South African migrants? Something you spoke about in your first interview….
Precisely. We recognise that there are a lot of people that are trapped here and would rather live abroad where they can do so under sharia law. We would facilitate the departure of people that prescribe to an alien culture and don’t want to be here.
We’d send them back to the society they wish to belong to again. I think that’s quite humane actually. I had a chat with a homeless Jamaican chap I saw freezing on the pavement. He was genuinely unhappy being here and expressed a desire to return to his family home in the Caribbean.
This would not be forced, but voluntary.
Do you think a lot of people would take the BNP up on the offer? How would you incentivise it?
I can assure you many people would take us up on the offer.
There are people prescribing to an alien culture (ie Sharia law) that are literally financially trapped in this country. Many don't even want to be here. I’d personally recommend helping them start their lives over in their homelands with the money we would save by repatriating them. We could build them complexes, like council estates that we would still own and let out to them. They'd be free to do as they please there, abide by their strict religious rules, engage in barbaric practices like female genital mutilation and the sorts of things they believe in away from our lands and on their own soil.
This would free up council homes, school places and ease the strain on our public services.
It would also then make room for more culturally compatible people (ie South Africans and Australians looking to join their families), who would be grateful, unlike the people here currently, who aren’t.
It is a win win situation for everyone.



(Source: europeanknightsproject.com)
votar

No hay comentarios.:

Publicar un comentario